Integrate automated Membership Inference Attacks with LLM diagnostics. Test your models for data leakage and receive plain-language explanations of privacy risks.
Explore Privacy EvaluationModern AI models often inadvertently "memorize" their training data. Membership Inference Attacks (MIA) allow us to test if a model's predictions can be exploited to determine if a specific record was part of the training set.
By automating these attacks during the evaluation phase, we identify high-risk samples and determine the model's vulnerability score before it touches production environments, ensuring regulatory and ethical compliance.
Execute automated black-box attacks to measure the probability of training data leakage, ensuring your model doesn't act as an accidental database.
Integrated Large Language Models translate complex technical metrics and attack vectors into readable summaries for stakeholders and compliance teams.
Visualize specific data clusters that are most susceptible to inference, allowing for targeted Differential Privacy application or data removal.
Automatically generate shadow models to simulate attacker behavior, providing a realistic assessment of how an external entity could exploit your AI.
Generate automated "Privacy Scorecards" that provide clear pass/fail results for data residency and privacy protection standards.
The LLM interface provides specific technical advice on reducing leakage, such as adjusting dropout rates or implementing noise-injection strategies.
Standard privacy tests produce raw percentages that are often difficult to interpret. Our architecture pipes these results into a specialized LLM agent that explains the contextual risk to non-technical stakeholders.
The system performs continuous automated probing of the model's decision boundaries, ensuring that as the model is fine-tuned, its privacy profile remains within safe tolerances.
Ensure that patient-trained diagnostic models cannot be reverse-engineered to reveal individual health status or identity.
Audit models trained on proprietary codebase or internal documents to ensure sensitive company information isn't retrievable through model outputs.
Provide transparent proof to end-users that their personal data has been processed into a model without sacrificing their anonymity.